| Author |
Topic  |
|
Riley
Member
4382 Posts |
Posted - 15 Dec 2011 : 4:03:00 PM
|
quote: Originally from typewatchenneagram.blogspot.com
Typewatch Instinct Ranges
the 3 ranges of sx/sp:
sx/sp seducer (weak sp) - sx in full command produces an active recruiter of potential mates; but being sx/sp this remains in the yin mode of seducing. charismatic and overtly sexualized, arguably the most purely sx of all stacks and ranges. draws from so/sx shadow to liven up sx into an erotic playfulness and to keep sx far ahead of their relatively nominal sp. an emotional yearning to their mating ritual; an inherently unstable range that can lead to a pattern of serial heartbreak. often confused for sx/so.
sx/sp mystifier (midrange) - the range where the mystique of the sx/sp stack is at its strongest. unconsciously attracts with intense eye contact and other sx feelers, but holds back enough to give them a kind of untouchable or hard to get close to quality. depending on their true intentions this can either frustrate their sx or reward their functional sp cooling system. like midrangers of all stacks, there's a seemingly casual approach to meeting their variant needs as the secondary instinct is kept both in play and at bay, and others may wonder what they really want.
sx/sp wanderer (strong sp) - the most clasically 'blocked' of the sx's, often exchanging intimacy in favor of the more immediate pleasures of the body. paradoxically the most wandering and restless of the sx/sp's. pulls from sp/so to ensure the sx flood is contained by the sp levee, which can provide a sense of stability at the expense of seeming put off by others. sex can mean a hollow satisfying of the instinct while more vulnerable feelings are suspended. quietly charged but muted, and can seem self pres first.
the 3 ranges of sp/sx:
sp/sx ascetic (weak sx) - mimics sp/so building of career and security, with an eye on advancement in the name of self sufficiency, but little or no concern for status as in the case of so/sp. generally serious but enjoys being amused by others. quote: "looking out for number one." pulls from: so/sp, to mute sx role: the island, the one-man enterprise exemplars: tiger woods, jerry west, hugh heffner, evel knievel, paul newman, george lucas, johnny carson fictional from star wars: boba fett
sp/sx binger (midline) - can 'hang out' around likeminded persons to imbibe in favorite goodies, though social interaction itself is not a priority. they do however remain slyly conscious of interpersonal attraction, even if characteristically hesitant to make a first move. whether alone or not, retains an air of privacy, reluctant to 'come out' of themselves. quote: "all things in moderation, including moderation." role: the soloist, the mercenary exemplars: kobe bryant, anthony bourdain, simon cowell, robert deniro, harrison ford, ralph nader fictional from star wars: han solo
sp/sx decadent (strong sx) - sp at its most saturated with sx; self-attending ways are offset by a wilder outgoing streak, reaching outside themselves then pulling back. noticable 'sx-y' quality, often enough to pass for sx first. quote: "what is my life, without the things I love?" pulls from: sx/so, to enhance sx role: the sensualist, the hedonist exemplars: david beckham, sarah mclachlan, dido, rachael ray, george harrison, maureen dowd fictional from star wars: lando calrissian
the 3 ranges of sp/so:
sp/so strongside (weak soc) - concerned with building and maintaining an orderly home, personal stability, and the protection and nurturing of these life support systems. consequently many strongsiders are concentrated in the small towns and suburban areas where likeminded people support and respect each other's space and privacy. tapping sx/sp gives them a taciturn edge, tending to be social-second in name only; this range is arguably the purest expression of self preservation. their somewhat gruff demeanor can make them quite amusing despite themselves. can occasionally seem sp/sx due to stronger focus on personal items, food, and domestic concerns. the pillar, the accountant, the farmer. martha stewart, julia child, emeril, andy rooney, leona helmsley, jack nicklaus. fictionals: archie bunker, frank barone, hank hill, scrooge, stanley hudson, oscar the grouch.
sp/so builder (midrange) - the most businesslike range of sp/so, and hence all stacks and ranges. trades a degree of self sufficiency to be involved with larger organizations, bringing along their natural propensity for development and management of resources. for example a strongsider may attain financial security for themselves or loved ones, but a midrange builder may enrich an entire team, company, or city on the way. frequently found among entrepreneurs, architects, engineers, bankers, city planners, corporate ceo's, and coaches, as well as proprietors and managers of small businesses. can be difficult for them to relate outside of their primary focus, being more 'locked in' to their stack than the other ranges. as such they are inclined to busy themselves with projects which seem useful to them. the planner, the developer, the executive. donald trump, bill gates, steve ballmer, newt gingrich, larry bird, mike ditka, ann richards, ross perot, john wayne, gerald ford, steve forbes, david stern. fictionals: lucy van pelt, peter griffin, jean pargeter.
sp/so weakside (strong soc) - draws from so/sx to produce what is overall a lighter, friendlier, and more humor employing style within self pres (though funny through conscious effort and without much irony, unlike strongsiders who are relatively less aware of how they're perceived). can seem more sociable than many so/sp's, and better embodying of a common touch. a notable degree of social consciousness tempers their more private security seeking instinct, so not surprisingly weaksiders can seem soc first, often with a certain generous or self sacrificial quality. the self deprecator, the sidekick, the philanthropist. james dobson, dan rather, david letterman, rush limbaugh, steven spielberg, al franken, don rickles, woody allen, ray romano, michael moore, jerry brown, charles barkley. fictionals: charlie brown, piglet, mr tumnus, threepio.
the 3 ranges of so/sp:
so/sp warmside (weak sp) - pulls from sx/so to enhance outer warmth, revving up the soc to where they can pass off as more stereotypically so/sx than many true so/sx's. not surprisingly, many supposed so/sx's are in fact so/sp's of this range. being sx last they tend to relate less through nonverbal expression and more through talking and joking around; but what they lack in subtlety they may make up for in overt conscientiousness, whereas so/sx's tend to be subtle and tactful. the populist, the humorist, the fundraiser. jay leno, arnold schwarzenegger, conan o'brien, "the rock", john mccain, ellen degeneres, george w. bush.
so/sp cordial (midrange) - the classic or 'true' so/sp, not likely to be mistaken for either so/sx nor sp/so. the most wide reaching and moderate of the ranges; friendly but not ingratiating, anchored by a larger sense of community but not at the expense of delicate alliances. more verbal than the formal range but less sociable than warmsiders; have a strong sense of fairness and equality, though an academic or careerist bent may come off as elitist. the journalist, the globalist, the egalitarian. obama, bob costas, mike wallace, al gore, hillary clinton, steve nash.
so/sp formal (strong sp) - pulls from sp/sx for a more self contained style. soc while still primary, is muted; can seem critical and more impersonal than the other ranges. a usual focus on topics, issues, and responsibilities affecting specific levels of society. usually well connected, but in informal settings may let others do most of the talking. can seem self pres at first glance. the pundit, the judge, the commentator. george will, larry king, bill maher, bill o'reilly, helen clark, jesse ventura, margaret thatcher.
the 3 ranges of so/sx:
the so/sx version is what I call lightside (soc as unquestioned dictator, just as in warmside so/sp), and on the other end is the darkside (soc as chairman, sx as vice chairman who sleeps with the chairman). and the midrange, that lovely muddy area in between where soc is the boss but sx at least has its own corner office.
lightsiders vs darksiders is almost like a phobic/counterphobic split in attitude. the lightside is engaging, ingratiating even, and is the closest to what has become the stereotype for so/sx. unmistakably friendly, amusing, eager to attend to others in a personal, customized way. also hesitant or unwilling to upset the delicate chemistry or harmony of individual or group dynamics, since soc cohesion is at a premium. some famous lightsiders: mister rogers, steve carrell, george foreman, ben affleck, zach braff, michael jackson, and bill clinton.
darksiders on the other hand seem eager to prove their soc isn't in full control, so they typically test the boundaries of traditional soc values. maybe knee-jerk reactions against sheepish herd behavior, group mentalities, or warmside strategies for making connections. they aren't any less healthy by definition, but can seem that way due to their darker, more confrontational manner. they use highly customized interactive tactics like all so/sx's, but in a more uncompromising "keeping it real" way, owing to the active tension between "good" soc and "bad" sx. some examples are woody harrelson, frank zappa, jack nicholson, lauryn hill, judy garland, chris rock, eminem, george carlin, andy warhol.
midrange so/sx's have a less pre-committed way of dealing with people, and therefore seem to express the mercurial qualities of the so/sx nature more than the others. I used to call it the "grey" range since it made me think of dusky unreadability, or manipulation through inscrutability. midrange so/sx's seem especially averse to being predictable, preferring the license to adapt whatever attitude the situation requires. until those conditions are clear they default to a kind of seeming indifference or nonchalance (a stark contrast to the sociably upfront quality of their cordial so/sp cousins). some examples of this pliant, laid back range of so/sx are hugh laurie, gene simmons, brad pitt, howard stern, hugh grant, shaquille o'neal, and garfield the cat.
the 3 ranges of sx/so:
fireside sx/so - strong sx, weak soc and weaker sp. pulls from sp/sx shadow to intensify sx. exhibitionism, wild abandon, most 'on fire' of all stacks or stack ranges.
flirter sx/so - strong sx, moderate soc, weak sp. highly sociable and extroverted per type, flirtatious interaction style, more coy than firesiders but more risque than coolsiders.
coolside sx/so - strong sx, strong soc, weak sp. pulls from so/sp secondary, political activist streak, 'cooled' by soc with some intellectual reserve, channels sx into social causes.
The source link has more information, including general type descriptions. I came across this awhile back when researching stacks, and thought you guys might enjoy it.
 |
|
|
sunny
Member
USA
9393 Posts |
Posted - 15 Dec 2011 : 4:14:17 PM
|
Interesting and accurate for me. I see myself as a young woman in the "seducer" description and later as "wanderer". There was a gradual change as my sp strengthened over the years. sp is almost as strong as my sx now, and I think I look like an sp.
-----------------------
|
 |
|
|
dfgray44
Member
USA
11074 Posts |
Posted - 15 Dec 2011 : 5:04:32 PM
|
Man, pretty high percentage of celeb mistypings there.
|
 |
|
|
rockthrower
Member
Australia
2617 Posts |
Posted - 15 Dec 2011 : 6:05:39 PM
|
Riley that was interesting to see john wayne listed as a 3 sp/so builder (midrange).
I see him as a 6w5 sx/so.
Am I way of the mark or is typewatchenneagram.blogspot incorrect?
|
 |
|
|
enneathing
Member
4622 Posts |
Posted - 15 Dec 2011 : 6:11:08 PM
|
I relate to these -
quote: sp/sx ascetic (weak sx) - mimics sp/so building of career and security, with an eye on advancement in the name of self sufficiency, but little or no concern for status as in the case of so/sp. generally serious but enjoys being amused by others. quote: "looking out for number one." pulls from: so/sp, to mute sx role: the island, the one-man enterprise
so/sp formal (strong sp) - pulls from sp/sx for a more self contained style. soc while still primary, is muted; can seem critical and more impersonal than the other ranges. a usual focus on topics, issues, and responsibilities affecting specific levels of society. usually well connected, but in informal settings may let others do most of the talking. can seem self pres at first glance.
Ultimately I feel like a soc/sp with strong sp/sx coloration. Therefore, formal.
I'm not sure if I'm interested in advanced for the sake of security of self-sufficiency... security is somewhat important, but I never considered myself that enamoured with material things.
Apparently there are actually 9 stack ranges for each.
|
 |
|
|
jevoudrais
Member
1697 Posts |
Posted - 15 Dec 2011 : 6:26:11 PM
|
| I ran this by my smartypants sexydude. He said it sounded like the same stacking teased out for the different types (so for example you'd find more 7s in one category), but that each person of that stacking would act like all three across time. |
 |
|
|
sunny
Member
USA
9393 Posts |
Posted - 15 Dec 2011 : 7:35:26 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by Riley
I can see myself both in the 'coolside sx/so' and the 'sx/sp mystifier' descriptions, with a little bit of the 'darkside so/sx'.
@JoL: Did anything in particular trigger the strengthening of your sp, or do you think it was just a process of maturation?

Yeah...I'd say it has to do with maturing in my case. In thinking about this, I realize that my sp is now too big...like my sx has always been. It's practically even with sx. The thing that's way behind both of them is the social.
-----------------------
|
 |
|
|
Narc
Member
1205 Posts |
Posted - 15 Dec 2011 : 8:07:49 PM
|
| Thanks Riley. |
 |
|
|
enneathing
Member
4622 Posts |
Posted - 15 Dec 2011 : 8:37:06 PM
|
I think I've pretty much always been a formal soc/sp.
I'm definitely not warmside soc/sp, or soc/sx of any kind.
In a way, I actually relate more to the midline sp/sx... I don't consider myself particularly dry, and the description for that might suit me more. Definitely not decadent though. I relate to 'soloist', 'island', more than 'pundit' or 'commentator'.
I feel, at this point, that I am a soc/sp who leans so much towards sp/sx, as to almost be a midline sp/sx.... |
Edited by - enneathing on 15 Dec 2011 9:28:59 PM |
 |
|
|
enneathing
Member
4622 Posts |
Posted - 15 Dec 2011 : 9:35:28 PM
|
Yeah, I started a thread on that cycle/rotation ages ago... but the idea had come up before that. It had been explored by others long before...
Though, Gray brought up a new and interesting idea, correlating the stacking rotation to tritype. This makes sense to me, as I relate to soc/sp 4, sp/sx 9, not sure about sx/so 6 but I can sort of see how that could work.
I like these ideas of stacking ranges, next thing I need to do is figure out which of the 9 ranges of soc/sp I am... I would be somewhere from range 6-9 of soc/sp, I think, but I haven't seen a description of these yet. |
Edited by - enneathing on 15 Dec 2011 9:47:13 PM |
 |
|
|
dfgray44
Member
USA
11074 Posts |
Posted - 15 Dec 2011 : 11:05:41 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by Riley
Regarding mistypings, I'm just the messenger here.
I still blame you....and always will.
|
 |
|
|
dusty
Member
2897 Posts |
Posted - 15 Dec 2011 : 11:09:05 PM
|
enneathing Gray brought up a new and interesting idea, correlating the stacking rotation to tritype. This makes sense to me, as I relate to soc/sp 4, sp/sx 9, not sure about sx/so 6 but I can sort of see how that could work.
I thought that was the Fauvre's thing?
You are the most repellant of creatures. |
 |
|
|
enneathing
Member
4622 Posts |
Posted - 15 Dec 2011 : 11:22:15 PM
|
| I had never heard of it until df mentioned it. |
Edited by - enneathing on 15 Dec 2011 11:27:17 PM |
 |
|
|
dusty
Member
2897 Posts |
Posted - 15 Dec 2011 : 11:31:12 PM
|
Ok. Can you elaborate on how that works?
You are the most repellant of creatures. |
 |
|
|
enneathing
Member
4622 Posts |
Posted - 15 Dec 2011 : 11:36:07 PM
|
The stacking rotation/tritype correlation?
Better to ask df, I'm pretty sure it was his idea not the Fauvres. I've never seen them mention it anywhere, anyway. |
 |
|
|
dfgray44
Member
USA
11074 Posts |
Posted - 15 Dec 2011 : 11:40:32 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by dusty
Ok. Can you elaborate on how that works?
You are the most repellant of creatures.
If I'm 9-7-4, and sp/sx...it would go:
9 sp/sx 7 sx/so 4 so/sp
|
 |
|
|
dusty
Member
2897 Posts |
Posted - 15 Dec 2011 : 11:51:41 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by dfgray44
quote: Originally posted by dusty
Ok. Can you elaborate on how that works?
You are the most repellant of creatures.
If I'm 9-7-4, and sp/sx...it would go:
9 sp/sx 7 sx/so 4 so/sp
Well yeah, I got that much. I thought there might be more than that. I mean, sx/so 7 certainly isn't as evident in your personality as sp/sx 7, right?
Riley, I'm talking about the second thing that enneathing mentioned.
quote: Yeah, I started a thread on that cycle/rotation ages ago... but the idea had come up before that. It had been explored by others long before...
Though, Gray brought up a new and interesting idea, correlating the stacking rotation to tritype. This makes sense to me, as I relate to soc/sp 4, sp/sx 9, not sure about sx/so 6 but I can sort of see how that could work.
You are the most repellant of creatures. |
Edited by - dusty on 15 Dec 2011 11:55:26 PM |
 |
|
|
dfgray44
Member
USA
11074 Posts |
Posted - 16 Dec 2011 : 12:10:01 AM
|
I'm trying to think of a way to make it more complicated.
|
 |
|
|
enneathing
Member
4622 Posts |
Posted - 16 Dec 2011 : 12:15:52 AM
|
| I don't relate to soc/sp 9 or soc/sp 6 much. df's theory works for me and is not that complicated. |
 |
|
|
dusty
Member
2897 Posts |
Posted - 16 Dec 2011 : 12:29:23 AM
|
quote: Originally posted by enneathing
I don't relate to soc/sp 9 or soc/sp 6 much. df's theory works for me and is not that complicated.
Really? I relate to sp 5 enormously and sp 9 quite a lot too. I can see sx/so 5 and so/sp 9 but it's much more hidden. When someone mentioned this before, they made it sound like you go through your tritype experiencing the first instinct (sp4 sp5 sp9) than you cycle through again and, in my case, experience sp/sx 4, sx/so 5 and so/sp 9. Like an undercurrent, I guess. I have no idea where I read this or I would bring it up.
You are the most repellant of creatures. |
 |
|
|
enneathing
Member
4622 Posts |
Posted - 16 Dec 2011 : 12:34:08 AM
|
| I think you relate to sp 5 because that is your wing. |
 |
|
|
dusty
Member
2897 Posts |
Posted - 16 Dec 2011 : 12:36:51 AM
|
quote: Originally posted by enneathing
I think you relate to sp 5 because that is your wing.
Because it's my wing and because it's in my tritype.
You are the most repellant of creatures. |
 |
|
|
dusty
Member
2897 Posts |
Posted - 16 Dec 2011 : 12:39:35 AM
|
I'm not interested in having a conversation about my tritype. I'm positive that I'm a 459.
You are the most repellant of creatures. |
 |
|
|
enneathing
Member
4622 Posts |
Posted - 16 Dec 2011 : 12:44:56 AM
|
| What? I wasn't challenging your tritype, I was saying I think the reason you relate to sp 5 is because it's a wing. I relate to social 5 because it's my wing, but I don't relate to social 9 or 6. |
 |
|
|
dusty
Member
2897 Posts |
Posted - 16 Dec 2011 : 12:48:32 AM
|
But I strongly relate to sp 9 as well. I think most people are in my boat as far as how they experience their tritype. You seem to have decided on 6 for yourself, then?
You are the most repellant of creatures. |
 |
|
|
enneathing
Member
4622 Posts |
Posted - 16 Dec 2011 : 01:36:48 AM
|
Yeah, 6w5 head fix.
Do you identify with one of these stack ranges for sp/sx dust?
I guess midline for both you and df. |
Edited by - enneathing on 16 Dec 2011 01:45:36 AM |
 |
|
Topic  |
|
|
|