| Author |
Topic  |
|
emerald
Member
994 Posts |
Posted - 13 Jul 2012 : 4:18:41 PM
|
In the last few days there have been three or more posts linking Hitler and/or genocide to Type 1 in one way or another. What's the connection?
1w9 - sp ISFJ |
Edited by - emerald on 14 Jul 2012 10:50:16 AM |
|
|
EMike583
Member
USA
1466 Posts |
Posted - 13 Jul 2012 : 4:30:22 PM
|
| Racists are mainly Eights and CP Sixes |
 |
|
|
Stormy
Member
United Kingdom
15365 Posts |
Posted - 13 Jul 2012 : 4:34:21 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by emerald
In the last few days there have been three or more posts linking Hitler and/or genocide to Type 1 in one way or another. What's the connection?
Resentment?
- [Stormy] |
 |
|
|
EMike583
Member
USA
1466 Posts |
Posted - 13 Jul 2012 : 4:37:13 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by Stormy
quote: Originally posted by emerald
In the last few days there have been three or more posts linking Hitler and/or genocide to Type 1 in one way or another. What's the connection?
Resentment?
- [Stormy]
'Resentment' in ennea-type I refers to that resentment surrounding taking up more responsibility than others, a feeling that the ennea-type I individual is working harder than everyone else. Source: Character and Neurosis |
 |
|
|
Stormy
Member
United Kingdom
15365 Posts |
Posted - 13 Jul 2012 : 4:41:09 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by EMike583
quote: Originally posted by Stormy
quote: Originally posted by emerald
In the last few days there have been three or more posts linking Hitler and/or genocide to Type 1 in one way or another. What's the connection?
Resentment?
'Resentment' in ennea-type I refers to that resentment surrounding taking up more responsibility than others, a feeling that the ennea-type I individual is working harder than everyone else. Source: Character and Neurosis
Precisely; he also could have had a 1-Wing.
- [Stormy] |
 |
|
|
EMike583
Member
USA
1466 Posts |
Posted - 13 Jul 2012 : 4:44:08 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by Stormy
quote: Originally posted by EMike583
quote: Originally posted by Stormy
quote: Originally posted by emerald
In the last few days there have been three or more posts linking Hitler and/or genocide to Type 1 in one way or another. What's the connection?
Resentment?
'Resentment' in ennea-type I refers to that resentment surrounding taking up more responsibility than others, a feeling that the ennea-type I individual is working harder than everyone else. Source: Character and Neurosis
Precisely; he also could have had a 1-Wing.
- [Stormy]
Who, Hitler? |
 |
|
|
quartz
Member
1510 Posts |
Posted - 13 Jul 2012 : 4:50:07 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by EMike583
Racists are mainly Eights and CP Sixes
There's already been a thread on racism and type. imo no need to rehash stuff from there. http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=27205
emerald, I'm not into the Hitler-typing debate, but I would imagine those who make such linkages are basing it on the 1's desire to eradicate evil. Personally, genocide strikes me as being more based in the 6's version of the good/evil dichotomy, but I don't have proof and am not invested enough in that guess/feel to try to debate it with those who may disagree. I think the kind of violence E1 might lend itself to is more of the "kill the Indian to save the man" type mentality.
quote:
An Indian boarding school refers to one of many schools that were established in the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries to educate Native American children and youths according to Euro-American standards. They were first established by Christian missionaries of various denominations, who often started schools on reservations and founded boarding schools to provide opportunities for children who did not have schools nearby,[1] especially in the lightly populated areas of the West. The government paid religious societies to provide education to Native American children on reservations. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) founded additional boarding schools based on the assimilation model of the Carlisle Indian Industrial School.
Children were usually immersed in European-American culture through appearance changes with haircuts, were forbidden to speak their native languages, and traditional names were replaced by new European-American names. The experience of the schools was often harsh, especially for the younger children who were separated from their families. In numerous ways, they were encouraged or forced to abandon their Native American identities and cultures...
....
The Carlisle Indian Industrial School, founded by the US Army officer Richard Henry Pratt in 1879 at a former military installation, became a model for others established by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). Pratt said in a speech in 1892, "A great general has said that the only good Indian is a dead one. In a sense, I agree with the sentiment, but only in this: that all the Indian there is in the race should be dead. Kill the Indian in him and save the man."[9] Pratt professed "assimilation through total immersion."[9] He had arranged for education of some young Indian men at the Hampton Institute, a historically black college, after he had supervised them as prisoners at a fort in Florida.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_American_boarding_schools
|
Edited by - quartz on 13 Jul 2012 4:51:29 PM |
 |
|
|
Stormy
Member
United Kingdom
15365 Posts |
Posted - 13 Jul 2012 : 4:51:19 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by EMike583
quote: Originally posted by Stormy
quote: Originally posted by EMike583
quote: Originally posted by Stormy
quote: Originally posted by emerald
In the last few days there have been three or more posts linking Hitler and/or genocide to Type 1 in one way or another. What's the connection?
Resentment?
'Resentment' in ennea-type I refers to that resentment surrounding taking up more responsibility than others, a feeling that the ennea-type I individual is working harder than everyone else. Source: Character and Neurosis
Precisely; he also could have had a 1-Wing.
Who, Hitler?
Well, not Naranjo. - 
- [Stormy] |
 |
|
|
Stormy
Member
United Kingdom
15365 Posts |
Posted - 13 Jul 2012 : 4:55:33 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by quartz
Personally, genocide strikes me as being more based in the 6's version of the good/evil dichotomy, but I don't have proof and am not invested enough in that guess/feel to try to debate it with those who may disagree. I think the kind of violence E1 might lend itself to is more of the "kill the Indian to save the man" type mentality.
quote: An Indian boarding school refers to one of many schools that were established in the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries to educate Native American children and youths according to Euro-American standards. They were first established by Christian missionaries of various denominations, who often started schools on reservations and founded boarding schools to provide opportunities for children who did not have schools nearby,[1] especially in the lightly populated areas of the West. The government paid religious societies to provide education to Native American children on reservations. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) founded additional boarding schools based on the assimilation model of the Carlisle Indian Industrial School.
Children were usually immersed in European-American culture through appearance changes with haircuts, were forbidden to speak their native languages, and traditional names were replaced by new European-American names. The experience of the schools was often harsh, especially for the younger children who were separated from their families. In numerous ways, they were encouraged or forced to abandon their Native American identities and cultures...
....
The Carlisle Indian Industrial School, founded by the US Army officer Richard Henry Pratt in 1879 at a former military installation, became a model for others established by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). Pratt said in a speech in 1892, "A great general has said that the only good Indian is a dead one. In a sense, I agree with the sentiment, but only in this: that all the Indian there is in the race should be dead. Kill the Indian in him and save the man."[9] Pratt professed "assimilation through total immersion."[9] He had arranged for education of some young Indian men at the Hampton Institute, a historically black college, after he had supervised them as prisoners at a fort in Florida.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_American_boarding_schools
"They [Unhealthy Ones] will argue that to save a village, it may be bombed into annihilation. To convert people to their religion, they may be sold into slavery. To protect the lives of unborn fetuses, the lives of adults may be taken." - Riso and Hudson, 'Personality Types', pg.398
- [Stormy] |
 |
|
|
skyboy
Member
France
1297 Posts |
Posted - 13 Jul 2012 : 6:09:49 PM
|
I don't think genocide is especially 1ish.
I watched another video about Congo. A psychologist interviewed many "child warriors" who had become adult and finally decided to try to go back to "normal life". The interviews insisted on the pride and instinct and pleasure to kill they remembered. I don't relate much of this "instinct to kill" to a type. I think it's a part of human nature we could have inherited from millenniums of war, which was a step of our "evolution".
Maybe the "warrior" archetype has something to do with type 8, but I'm not so sure. My mother is an 8w7 and even though she likes a good fight for defending her rights and tribe with her body, she hates violence and scenes of physical wounds and blood. I think the pleasure to kill and destroy is simply a part of us, that can be used if we feel it as necessary. We're just lesser in touch with it in our occidental countries where murder is illegal and usually not very helpful. Personally, I can fantasize easily on it and it has a natural physical echo in me I don't clearly relate to fixation 8.
I don't remember echoes of 1ness in these African genocides.
But the NAZI stuff was different. The propaganda itself contains elements of 1ness that seemed rather clear to me. This does not prove Hitler was a 1, but that people behind the propaganda had a 1ish inspiration. Maybe Hitler was one of them. It's a sort of idealistic : "let's do everything to fix the situation and restore quality standards".
This reminds me of these words by Albert Camus << The ends justify the means But what justify the ends ? >>
Maybe the NAZI soldiers and generals who committed the slaughters where neither 1s nor inspired by 1ness. No-one knows their personal motivation to kill, supposing they had personal motivations.
But the whole think was "packed up" in a 1ish decoration. Several elements I heard from the propaganda : << We all know it's hard to stand next to hundreds of dead bodies, but our soldiers have courageously stood with dignity >> They talked about the slaughter of hundreds of Jews. The message is "it's hard to kill, it needs efforts and is emotionally difficult, but our glory and superiority is to overcome this". It's the message that this is self-sacrifice by the German soldiers. Self-sacrifice in the name of a higher purpose is a constant message of the NAZI system.
They also put together images of a perfect word where everything is under control and working well : houses have been built, streets have be cleaned (they don't mention the detail that hobos were "cleaned" as well). They give pictures of humble people living happily in simple clean place, grateful to the German Reich to have helped them get out of the chaos of misery and unemployment.
4w5 SP/SO (Tritype 451) |
 |
|
|
emerald
Member
994 Posts |
Posted - 13 Jul 2012 : 7:57:24 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by quartz
quote: Originally posted by EMike583
Racists are mainly Eights and CP Sixes
There's already been a thread on racism and type. imo no need to rehash stuff from there. http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=27205
emerald, I'm not into the Hitler-typing debate, but I would imagine those who make such linkages are basing it on the 1's desire to eradicate evil. Personally, genocide strikes me as being more based in the 6's version of the good/evil dichotomy, but I don't have proof and am not invested enough in that guess/feel to try to debate it with those who may disagree. I think the kind of violence E1 might lend itself to is more of the "kill the Indian to save the man" type mentality.
quote:
An Indian boarding school refers to one of many schools that were established in the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries to educate Native American children and youths according to Euro-American standards. They were first established by Christian missionaries of various denominations, who often started schools on reservations and founded boarding schools to provide opportunities for children who did not have schools nearby,[1] especially in the lightly populated areas of the West. The government paid religious societies to provide education to Native American children on reservations. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) founded additional boarding schools based on the assimilation model of the Carlisle Indian Industrial School.
Children were usually immersed in European-American culture through appearance changes with haircuts, were forbidden to speak their native languages, and traditional names were replaced by new European-American names. The experience of the schools was often harsh, especially for the younger children who were separated from their families. In numerous ways, they were encouraged or forced to abandon their Native American identities and cultures...
....
The Carlisle Indian Industrial School, founded by the US Army officer Richard Henry Pratt in 1879 at a former military installation, became a model for others established by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). Pratt said in a speech in 1892, "A great general has said that the only good Indian is a dead one. In a sense, I agree with the sentiment, but only in this: that all the Indian there is in the race should be dead. Kill the Indian in him and save the man."[9] Pratt professed "assimilation through total immersion."[9] He had arranged for education of some young Indian men at the Hampton Institute, a historically black college, after he had supervised them as prisoners at a fort in Florida.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_American_boarding_schools
I can't relate at all to the kind of thinking displayed in this article. Wanting to eradicate evil is very different from harming a person. Equating evil with a certain race is also foreign. Kill the Indian to save the man is an abhorent thought. I have a hard time thinking of any of these as One attitudes.
1w9 - sp ISFJ |
 |
|
|
emerald
Member
994 Posts |
Posted - 13 Jul 2012 : 8:18:15 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by Stormy
"They [Unhealthy Ones] will argue that to save a village, it may be bombed into annihilation. To convert people to their religion, they may be sold into slavery. To protect the lives of unborn fetuses, the lives of adults may be taken." - Riso and Hudson, 'Personality Types', pg.398
- [Stormy]
I have only one Riso book, Understanding the Enneagram.. In that one he refers to "punitive retribution" at the unhealthiest level of One behavior. That sounds more like "pay back." But perhaps the passage you quoted are examples of the contradictory behavior (violation of one's own beliefs) that can occur when a One sinks into the abyss?
1w9 - sp ISFJ |
 |
|
|
emerald
Member
994 Posts |
Posted - 13 Jul 2012 : 8:35:14 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by skyboy
I don't think genocide is especially 1ish.
I watched another video about Congo. A psychologist interviewed many "child warriors" who had become adult and finally decided to try to go back to "normal life". The interviews insisted on the pride and instinct and pleasure to kill they remembered. I don't relate much of this "instinct to kill" to a type. I think it's a part of human nature we could have inherited from millenniums of war, which was a step of our "evolution".
Maybe the "warrior" archetype has something to do with type 8, but I'm not so sure. My mother is an 8w7 and even though she likes a good fight for defending her rights and tribe with her body, she hates violence and scenes of physical wounds and blood. I think the pleasure to kill and destroy is simply a part of us, that can be used if we feel it as necessary. We're just lesser in touch with it in our occidental countries where murder is illegal and usually not very helpful. Personally, I can fantasize easily on it and it has a natural physical echo in me I don't clearly relate to fixation 8.
I don't remember echoes of 1ness in these African genocides.
But the NAZI stuff was different. The propaganda itself contains elements of 1ness that seemed rather clear to me. This does not prove Hitler was a 1, but that people behind the propaganda had a 1ish inspiration. Maybe Hitler was one of them. It's a sort of idealistic : "let's do everything to fix the situation and restore quality standards".
This reminds me of these words by Albert Camus << The ends justify the means But what justify the ends ? >>
Maybe the NAZI soldiers and generals who committed the slaughters where neither 1s nor inspired by 1ness. No-one knows their personal motivation to kill, supposing they had personal motivations.
But the whole think was "packed up" in a 1ish decoration. Several elements I heard from the propaganda : << We all know it's hard to stand next to hundreds of dead bodies, but our soldiers have courageously stood with dignity >> They talked about the slaughter of hundreds of Jews. The message is "it's hard to kill, it needs efforts and is emotionally difficult, but our glory and superiority is to overcome this". It's the message that this is self-sacrifice by the German soldiers. Self-sacrifice in the name of a higher purpose is a constant message of the NAZI system.
They also put together images of a perfect word where everything is under control and working well : houses have been built, streets have be cleaned (they don't mention the detail that hobos were "cleaned" as well). They give pictures of humble people living happily in simple clean place, grateful to the German Reich to have helped them get out of the chaos of misery and unemployment.
4w5 SP/SO (Tritype 451)
Seems to me propaganda could be unhealthy 1ish, but not atrocities. I don't think 1s are a "means to an end" kind of group. Can't tolerate that degree of wrongness. Our kind of perfect world doesn't include stamping out those who are different. We might when unhealthy go so far as to judge them as ignorant or stupid or wrong or crazy or warped or blind but that wouldn't lead to hurting them, especially not physical attack, blood, maiming and death.
1w9 - sp ISFJ |
 |
|
|
quartz
Member
1510 Posts |
Posted - 13 Jul 2012 : 9:50:44 PM
|
In the unhealthy levels, every type has a kind of blindness about the ways that their actions run counter to their type's ideals. In the warped thinking of an unhealthy individual, "kill the Indian to save the man" isn't viewed as willingness to commit atrocities. It may be seen by such a person as tantamount to amputating a gangrenous limb to save the patient's life. In each type, if you take the noble-sounding ideals of the high-average and higher levels, then warp the perception and take them to a delusional extreme, you get behaviors that a person in the average and healthy ranges could never imagine themselves doing. If you look only at the endpoints of the continuum they may seem unrelated; but if you trace the mindset along its descent into unhealth, the bizarre connection becomes clear. No, no 1 would commit atrocities. The catch is that the 1 himself is defining the word "atrocity." It's a big catch.
Cultural upbringing also plays into what a person regards as atrocity. In one culture, "honor killings" of women whose ankles show is normal and accepted; in another, they are atrocities. To assume that everyone in every context, at every level of health, defines atrocities in the same way would be erroneous. The definition seems self-evident to you.... their point of view seems self-evident to them. I had one conversation with a 1 friend (in person) where the 1 was very upset over something much smaller than what we're discussing here, not violent or anything... but watching her struggle to grasp how the other person could honestly see nothing wrong with what they had done... it was eye opening for me. It relates to the 1 confusing their truth for Absolute (and fully objective) Truth. Other people's truth is as real and "right" to them as yours is to you. Not necessarily easy to hear, but then a lot of the most useful material in the E. is hard to hear.
P.S. Even if I'm right in saying the Indian schools were rooted in and/or aided by a 1-based mindset, it doesn't mean it implicitly rubs off on you. In case that helps. You aren't implicated by association with what unhealthy people do just because they happen to be the same type. Every type gets warped in the unhealthiest ranges. 9's probably the least obvious, but yeah you get some pretty rough [blocked] in most types at the bottom of the health ladder. |
 |
|
|
emerald
Member
994 Posts |
Posted - 13 Jul 2012 : 10:02:52 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by quartz
In the unhealthy levels, every type has a kind of blindness about the ways that their actions run counter to their type's ideals. In the warped thinking of an unhealthy individual, "kill the Indian to save the man" isn't viewed as willingness to commit atrocities. It may be seen by such a person as tantamount to amputating a gangrenous limb to save the patient's life. In each type, if you take the noble-sounding ideals of the high-average and higher levels, then warp the perception and take them to a delusional extreme, you get behaviors that a person in the average and healthy ranges could never imagine themselves doing. If you look only at the endpoints of the continuum they may seem unrelated; but if you trace the mindset along its descent into unhealth, the bizarre connection becomes clear. No, no 1 would commit atrocities. The catch is that the 1 himself is defining the word "atrocity." It's a big catch.
Cultural upbringing also plays into what a person regards as atrocity. In one culture, "honor killings" of women whose ankles show is normal and accepted; in another, they are atrocities. To assume that everyone in every context, at every level of health, defines atrocities in the same way would be erroneous. The definition seems self-evident to you.... their point of view seems self-evident to them. I had one conversation with a 1 friend (in person) where the 1 was very upset over something much smaller than what we're discussing here, not violent or anything... but watching her struggle to grasp how the other person could honestly see nothing wrong with what they had done... it was eye opening for me. It relates to the 1 confusing their truth for Absolute (and fully objective) Truth. Other people's truth is as real and "right" to them as yours is to you. Not necessarily easy to hear, but then a lot of the most useful material in the E. is hard to hear.
P.S. Even if I'm right in saying the Indian schools were rooted in and/or aided by a 1-based mindset, it doesn't mean it implicitly rubs off on you. In case that helps. You aren't implicated by association with what unhealthy people do just because they happen to be the same type. Every type gets warped in the unhealthiest ranges. 9's probably the least obvious, but yeah you get some pretty rough [blocked] in most types at the bottom of the health ladder.
That makes sense to me, quartz.
I was using the word "atrocities" in the sense they were being discussed here on the board where there seems to be some consensus.
1w9 - sp ISFJ |
 |
|
|
whitelila
Member
5188 Posts |
Posted - 13 Jul 2012 : 10:07:38 PM
|
osama bin laden is often typed as a 1.
kill the infidels.
|
Edited by - whitelila on 13 Jul 2012 10:08:14 PM |
 |
|
|
emerald
Member
994 Posts |
Posted - 14 Jul 2012 : 12:34:53 AM
|
quote: Originally posted by whitelila
osama bin laden is often typed as a 1.
kill the infidels.
Jeepers. Do you agree with that typing?
1w9 - sp ISFJ |
 |
|
|
EMike583
Member
USA
1466 Posts |
Posted - 14 Jul 2012 : 02:14:18 AM
|
Quartz: "Cultural upbringing also plays into what a person regards as atrocity. In one culture, "honor killings" of women whose ankles show is normal and accepted; in another, they are atrocities. [...] Other people's truth is as real and "right" to them as yours is to you." Sounds like you're advocating moral relativism. I personally reject this stance and believe that moral truth can be discerned rationally, a priori. Imagine how shallow moral judgments would be if they were simply a matter of adhering to cultural mores, without any sort of overriding principle at work.
I think you're also conflating 'is' and 'ought': that there is a society somewhere in the world that regards a given action as moral says precisely nothing about that action's status from a normative ethical viewpoint. For instance, would it be a sound endeavor to try to justify Jim Crow by appealing to the context in which the laws existed? If we were talking about history, which is a purely descriptive discipline, this would be a different story, and context would be critical in reaching a historical understanding of the Jim Crow South. But we are talking about ethics here, not history.
Cultural tolerance is fine, throwing out all standards is something else. |
Edited by - EMike583 on 14 Jul 2012 02:16:26 AM |
 |
|
|
rockthrower
Member
Australia
2699 Posts |
Posted - 14 Jul 2012 : 02:18:39 AM
|
quote: Originally posted by emerald
In the last few days there have been three or more posts linking Hitler and/or genocide to Type 1 in one way or another. What's the connection?
1w9 - sp ISFJ
It may be that the globule markets are unstable and A'doff was an SP. There may be some new energy building, with in the, you Know, collective un conches.
I see subtle signs in my local National media and within the political cut and thrust.
Instinct is an interesting phenomenon. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=5Dea5j475H4&NR=1
|
 |
|
|
skyboy
Member
France
1297 Posts |
Posted - 14 Jul 2012 : 03:55:43 AM
|
quote: Originally posted by emerald Seems to me propaganda could be unhealthy 1ish, but not atrocities. I don't think 1s are a "means to an end" kind of group. Can't tolerate that degree of wrongness. Our kind of perfect world doesn't include stamping out those who are different. We might when unhealthy go so far as to judge them as ignorant or stupid or wrong or crazy or warped or blind but that wouldn't lead to hurting them, especially not physical attack, blood, maiming and death.
To me, Quartz' reply was brilliant. I almost feel like I have nothing to add. What we call "atrocities" today would not have been three centuries ago. Or say, there was no consensus about it at all. Slavery of African black people was perfectly normal (socially). The bible even describes how you should punish your slaves to avoid them getting used to freedom. We may look at it with surprise today, but it was a reference in people's mind in earlier centuries.
For healthy 1s, truth and accuracy are very important and never denied. Supposing Hitler was a 1, no need to look at these levels. It's hard to know how he created the theory of Jews being responsible for the situation. A part of it could being blinded and energized by anger. Also, it's important to remember that it was all around. "Gather our forces to reconquer what belongs to the German People whatever it costs" is not a strange idea that came to his mind out of personal neurosis. It was all around !
4w5 SP/SO (Tritype 451) |
 |
|
|
Stormy
Member
United Kingdom
15365 Posts |
Posted - 14 Jul 2012 : 04:22:14 AM
|
quote: Originally posted by emerald
quote: Originally posted by Stormy
"They [Unhealthy Ones] will argue that to save a village, it may be bombed into annihilation. To convert people to their religion, they may be sold into slavery. To protect the lives of unborn fetuses, the lives of adults may be taken." - Riso and Hudson, 'Personality Types', pg.398
I have only one Riso book, Understanding the Enneagram.. In that one he refers to "punitive retribution" at the unhealthiest level of One behavior. That sounds more like "pay back." But perhaps the passage you quoted are examples of the contradictory behavior (violation of one's own beliefs) that can occur when a One sinks into the abyss?
Yes; immediately following the above quote:
"Realizing that they may be using sophistry does not deter unhealthy Ones for a moment, since their psychological survival depends on rationalizing whatever they do, no matter how much their actions conflict with their stated beliefs." - Riso and Hudson, 'Personality Types', pg.398-9
- [Stormy] |
 |
|
|
MH
Member
12309 Posts |
Posted - 14 Jul 2012 : 04:43:45 AM
|
| For me I see Hitler as type 6 but not indicative of all of type 6 in any way, or even close. Hitler was a pos imo. I dont bunch things together in a we way tho. |
 |
|
|
MH
Member
12309 Posts |
Posted - 14 Jul 2012 : 04:46:11 AM
|
| Stormy isnt that superego just in general though? I do not get how superego messages of 1 are opposed to superego 6 here |
 |
|
|
Stormy
Member
United Kingdom
15365 Posts |
Posted - 14 Jul 2012 : 04:55:07 AM
|
quote: Originally posted by May Hem
Stormy isnt that superego just in general though? I do not get how superego messages of 1 are opposed to superego 6 here
The superego of E6 is basically saying "look-out for everyone else's superego" - dealing with others' rationalizations.
- [Stormy] |
 |
|
|
loscust
Member
414 Posts |
|
|
quartz
Member
1510 Posts |
Posted - 14 Jul 2012 : 09:57:25 AM
|
quote: Originally posted by EMike583 Sounds like you're advocating moral relativism. I personally reject this stance and believe that moral truth can be discerned rationally, a priori.
I think you're also conflating 'is' and 'ought': that there is a society somewhere in the world that regards a given action as moral says precisely nothing about that action's status from a normative ethical viewpoint.
Cultural tolerance is fine, throwing out all standards is something else.
No, I don't advocate moral relativism. I was neither stating nor implying any "oughts" nor defending things that people do from one or another viewpoint. I made no comment on whether I believe there to be moral absolutes or such a thing as objective truth. My comment had to do with a description of how a type's self-definition (e.g. "I would never commit atrocities") combines with the individual's assumptions (e.g. "you must purge the evil from among you") -- whether individually concluded or culturally learned -- to make it possible for a single self definition to produce a widely varying range of actions as a result of the other assumptions. It was descriptive of how variation in the definition of a crucial term affects the concrete expression of any given element of self-concept.
My post was descriptive about an element of the relationship between self-concept and actions. It was no stance of any kind about the existence or nature of moral standards.
|
Edited by - quartz on 14 Jul 2012 09:58:29 AM |
 |
|
Topic  |
|
|
|